Comparing the clinical applicability of wavefront phase imaging in keratoconus versus normal eyes.

The aim of this work is to quantitatively assess the wavefront phase of keratoconic eyes measured by the ocular aberrometer t·eyede (based on WaveFront Phase Imaging Sensor), characterized by a lateral resolution of 8.6 µm without requiring any optical element to sample the wavefront information. We evaluated the parameters: root mean square error, Peak-to-Valley, and amplitude of the predominant frequency (Fourier Transform analysis) of a section of the High-Pass filter map in keratoconic and healthy cohorts. Furthermore, we have analyzed keratoconic eyes that presented dark-light bands in this map to assess their period and orientation with the Fourier Transform. There are significant statistical differences (p value < 0.001) between healthy and keratoconic eyes in the three parameters, demonstrating a tendency to increase with the severity of the disease. Otherwise, the quantification of the bands reveals that the width is independent of eye laterality and keratoconic stage as orientation, which tends to be oblique. In conclusion, the quantitative results obtained with t·eyede could help to diagnose and monitor the progression of keratoconus.

Ultra-High Resolution Optical Aberrometry in Patients with Keratoconus: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study performs optical aberration assessment in patients using a novel ultra-high-resolution device. The objective of this study is to analyze optical aberrations, especially the very high order wavefront (more than 10th order of Zernike coefficients), and compare between keratoconus and healthy patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed 43 eyes from 25 healthy patients and 43 eyes from 27 patients with keratoconus using corneal tomography and a very high-resolution (8.55 µm) aberrometer prototype (T-eyede) outfitted with a sensor originally developed for use in the field of astrophysics. Corneal aberration values were assessed using an optical model built with Zemax optical software, while ocular aberrations were assessed using T-eyede. In addition, image-processing analysis was performed of the wavefront phase, creating a high-pass filter map. RESULTS: We found lower values for ocular aberrations than corneal aberrations in both groups (p < 0.001). Specifically, we found a reduction in primary astigmatism (0.145 µm) and primary coma (0.017 µm). Also, the keratoconus group showed significantly higher wavefront aberration values compared with controls (p < 0.001). An analysis of the high-pass filter map revealed 2 contrasting results: one smooth or clear, while the other presented a banding pattern. Almost all in the control group (95%) showed the first pattern, while 77% of the keratoconus group showed a banding pattern on the filtered map (chi-squared test, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This device provides reliable, precise measurements of ocular aberrations that correlate well with corneal aberrations. Furthermore, the extraordinary high-resolution measurements revealed unprecedented micro changes in the wavefront phase of patients with keratoconus that varied with disease stage. These findings could lead to new screening or follow-up methods.

Wavefront phase measurement of striae in optical glass.

We present a method for evaluating the quality of optical glass using a high-resolution wavefront sensor, the wavefront phase imaging (WFPI) sensor. As shadowgraphy is a widely used method for inspecting striae in optical glass, it does not provide a quantitative metric that represents the potential optical quality of the glass and should be based on the operator's experience. We compare the proposed method in two experiments. First, we compare it with the results obtained by shadowgraphy on a variety of samples. Second, we compare the results of a single-point chromatic confocal profilometer on a calibrated sample. The WFPI shows results comparable to the reference method in both cases but provides more information than shadowgraphy and avoids the human factor in the measurement.